×
3 694
Fashion Jobs
HEAD OFFICE
IT Asset Manager
Permanent · BRACKNELL
WAITROSE
Warehouse Operative
Permanent · BRACKNELL
HEAD OFFICE
Cyber Security Lead – Incident Response
Permanent · BRACKNELL
JOHN LEWIS
7.5t c1 Driver Installer
Permanent · CAMBRIDGE
FRASERS GROUP
Marketing Executive - Sports Directory
Permanent · DARTFORD
FRASERS GROUP
Lead Creative Designer - Sports Directory
Permanent · DARTFORD
SPORTS DIRECT
Loss Prevention Supervisor-Sports Direct
Permanent · LEICESTER
SPORTS DIRECT
Loss Prevention Supervisor
Permanent · LONDON
NEW LOOK
Buyers Administration Assistant - Level 2
Permanent · LONDON
AESOP
Sales & Training Manager, Wholesale & Travel Retail Emea
Permanent · London
AESOP
Retail Consultants | Aesop Regent Street, London | Part Time And Full Time
Permanent · London
AESOP
Retail Consultant | Aesop Covent Garden, London | Part Time
Permanent · London
VF INTERNATIONAL
Warehouse Team Leader
Permanent · COALVILLE
SHISEIDO
Senior Ecommerce Manager - Nars, Shiseido & Drunk Elephant
Permanent · London
SHISEIDO
CRM Coordinator
Permanent · London
MULBERRY
PA to Global Marketing Director
Permanent · LONDON
MULBERRY
Commercial Finance Analyst (Part-Qualified)
Permanent · LONDON
NEXT
Stock Coordinator - Oxford Westgate
Permanent · OXFORD
NEXT
Sales Coordinator - Surrey Quays Concession
Permanent · LONDON
NEXT
Sales Manager - Kings Lynn
Permanent · KING'S LYNN
JIGSAW
Financial Controller
Permanent · LONDON
HARVEY NICHOLS
Brand Consultant - Sunglasses
Permanent · LONDON
Ads
By
Reuters
Published
Mar 29, 2017
Reading time
2 minutes
Share
Download
Download the article
Print
Click here to print
Text size
aA+ aA-

Top EU court to weigh in on luxury brands' attempts to ban online sales

By
Reuters
Published
Mar 29, 2017

Europe's top court will begin a landmark case on Thursday which could determine whether luxury goods companies can stop retailers from selling their products via marketplaces such as Amazon or eBay.



Owners of luxury brands have been fighting with online retailers for the last decade, arguing that they should have the right to choose who distributes their products to protect their luxury image and exclusivity.

Online platforms dispute this, saying that such restrictive distribution deals are anti-competitive and hurt consumers.

The dispute is in the spotlight now because of the European Commission's push for more cross-border online sales to boost growth and jobs, and catch up with the United States and Asia.

The case before the Luxembourg-based Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) concerns German company Coty, a subsidiary of U.S. beauty products maker Coty Inc, which wants to stop a retailer from selling its goods on online marketplaces such as Amazon.

Coty says this breaches its agreement with the retailer which prohibits the sale of its products via third parties. The case originally went to a court in Germany which subsequently asked the ECJ for guidance.

The EU court's ruling will be crucial because more and more companies, and not just luxury brands, are seeking to curb sales of their products online, Thomas Graf, a partner at law firm Cleary Gottlieb, said.

"The case may matter for some products, like luxury products, more. But it has general implications because it deals with the conditions that suppliers can define for selling via online channels, such as marketplaces," Graf said.

"Several of the cases that have come up in Germany for example involved school bags."

Lobby group Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA), whose members include Amazon, eBay, Facebook, Google, Rakuten and Yahoo, agreed that the problem was a broader one than just luxury good companies protecting their turf.

"We do not consider this to be a 'fight' with or against luxury brands," CCIA director Jakob Kucharczyk, said.

"This issue is far more relevant because online marketplace bans are imposed with respect to a range of day-to-day, mass market products which makes them anti-competitive and unjustifiable. That's the real problem, not a handful of high-end luxury brands that don't use outside distributors," he said, without giving any examples.

A court adviser is expected to give a non-binding recommendation in about six months, followed by the court judgment a few months later.

The case is C-230 Coty Germany.

(Reporting by Foo Yun Chee. Editing by Jane Merriman)

 

© Thomson Reuters 2023 All rights reserved.