×
4 410
Fashion Jobs
SCHUH
Head of Central Merchandising
Permanent · BATHGATE
HOLLISTER CO. STORES
Hollister CO. - Brand Representative, Meadowhall
Permanent · Sheffield
ABERCROMBIE AND FITCH STORES
Abercrombie & Fitch - Brand Representative, George Street
Permanent · Edinburgh
HOMESENSE
20066- tk Maxx Homesense Greenwich / Thurrock Security Loss Prevention Advisor Full Time 37.5 Hrs
Permanent · London
COTY
Pan eu Senior Key Account Manager
Permanent · London
DR. MARTENS
Finance Accounting Manager, Korea
Permanent ·
VIVIENNE WESTWOOD
Accounts Payable Assistant
Permanent · LONDON
MULBERRY
Warehouse Administrator
Permanent · SHEPTON MALLET
FRASERS GROUP
PR Manager - Flannels
Permanent · LONDON
EVERLAST GYMS
General Manager - Everlast Gyms
Permanent · EPSOM
BOOHOOMAN
Menswear Buyer
Permanent · MANCHESTER
PRIMARK
Business Analyst - Checkout Management Epos
Permanent · READING
PRIMARK
Business Analyst - Checkout Management Mpe
Permanent · READING
HOLLISTER CO. STORES
Hollister CO. - Brand Representative, Stratford (Westfield)
Permanent · London
LEVI'S
Keyholder - 30 Hours Per Week
Permanent · Norwich
L'OREAL GROUP
Prada Beauty Deputy Business Manager, 1.0, Harrods London
Permanent · London
ESTÉE LAUDER
Clinique - Consultant - Marks & Spencer - 15 Hours
Permanent · London
ESTÉE LAUDER
Clinique - Account Manager - Boots - 30 Hours
Permanent · Berkshire
ESTÉE LAUDER
Clinique - Consultant - John Lewis - 13 Hours
Permanent · High Wycombe
AESOP
Retail Consultant | Aesop Piccadilly Arcade, London | Full Time
Permanent · London
TK MAXX
Security And Loss Prevention Advisor
Permanent · Preston
TJX EUROPE
Brand & Marketing Administrator
Permanent · Grand Londres
Ads
By
AFP
Published
Aug 4, 2016
Reading time
3 minutes
Share
Download
Download the article
Print
Click here to print
Text size
aA+ aA-

Top designers back Apple in Samsung patent appeal

By
AFP
Published
Aug 4, 2016

More than 100 global design professionals on Thursday offered support to Apple in its long-running patent design battle with Samsung, now before the US Supreme Court.


Apple


The group, which includes US fashion designer Calvin Klein, Nicolas Ghesquiere of the French group Louis Vuitton and renowned German industrial designer Dieter Rams joined an amicus brief supporting Apple's contention that Samsung's $548 million penalty for infringing on a design patent should stand.

The case is expected to result in a landmark decision on whether total profits from an unlawfully copied design should be assessed as a penalty, in the first major design patent case at the top US court in over a century.

The amicus brief filed on behalf of design professionals, researchers and academics said they have no financial interest in the case but argue on the basis of "fundamental principles of visual design."

They cite precedents like the Coca-Cola bottle, which is an integral part of the value of the product, according to the brief.

"The history of industrial design and the experience of America's most profitable industries demonstrate that a product's visual design becomes the product itself in the mind of consumers," they argued.

"It is the design of a successful product that embodies the consumer's understanding of and desire to own and interact with it."

Other signatories of the brief include Bentley Motors designer Stefan Hans Sielaff, Terence Conran of Conran Holdings and fashion designer Alexander Wang.

- Clash with tech firms -

The arguments run counter to those offered by many in the technology industry, who claim that upholding the award will only encourage frivolous suits filed by "patent trolls" that make no products.


Apple


A brief filed earlier this year by Google, Facebook, eBay, Dell, Hewlett-Packard Enterprise and others said allowing the award to stand "will lead to absurd results and have a devastating impact on companies... that spend billions of dollars annually on research and development for complex technological products and their components."

The tech firms argued that awarding a design patent holder the total profit from an infringer's product when the design covers only a relatively minor portion of the product "is out of proportion with the significance of the design and out of touch with economic realities."

A California jury ruled that Samsung had infringed on the US firm's patent for the iPhone, including for its design, in smartphones made by the South Korean giant.

The Supreme Court in February agreed to hear the case, opening the door to reducing the hundreds of millions of dollars in damages owed in the blockbuster patent case between the world's biggest smartphone makers.

The justices will not reconsider Samsung's guilt, but will look at whether the penalty was excessive for copyright infringement of certain electronic components.

Samsung last year agreed to pay Apple some $548 million, pending the outcome of the appeal.

But Samsung argued that $399 million of the penalty was excessive because it was based on the premise that "Apple was 'entitled to' those entire profits no matter how little the patented design features contributed to the value of Samsung's phones," according to the appeal brief.

Copyright © 2023 AFP. All rights reserved. All information displayed in this section (dispatches, photographs, logos) are protected by intellectual property rights owned by Agence France-Presse. As a consequence you may not copy, reproduce, modify, transmit, publish, display or in any way commercially exploit any of the contents of this section without the prior written consent of Agence France-Presses.