11 124
Fashion Jobs
ESSILORLUXOTTICA GROUP
Regional Medical Science Liaison Midlands UK
Permanent · BIRMINGHAM
BARBOUR
Global Ecommerce Content & SEO Manager
Permanent · SOUTH SHIELDS
BARBOUR
Senior Warehouse Supervisor
Permanent · JARROW
SAINSBURY'S
Home Delivery Driver
Permanent · NANTWICH
PENTLAND
Customer Operations Executive (Edi)
Permanent · SUNDERLAND
PENTLAND
Creative Team (Art Director + Copywriter)
Permanent · LONDON
MARKS&SPENCER
Senior Project Manager - International
Permanent · LONDON
MARKS&SPENCER
Project Manager - Ecom Distribution
Permanent · CASTLE DONINGTON
MARKS&SPENCER
Assistant Commercial Manager (B2B Gift Cards)
Permanent · LONDON
MARKS&SPENCER
Assistant Digital Marketing Manager (Marketplaces)
Permanent · LONDON
MARKS&SPENCER
Marketplace Planner (Junior Merchandiser)
Permanent · LONDON
UNILEVER
Regional Business Development Manager
Permanent · KINGSTON UPON THAMES
URBN
Urban Outfitters Stockroom Receiver - Manchester, UK (25 Hrs)
Permanent · MANCHESTER
EVERLAST GYMS
Systems & Data Coordinator
Permanent · SHIREBROOK
HENKEL
Key Account Manager - High Street And Value
Permanent · HEMEL HEMPSTEAD
FASHION PERSONNEL
Allocator
Permanent · LONDON
FASHION PERSONNEL
Demand And Supply Planning Executive
Permanent · LONDON
FASHION PERSONNEL
E-Commerce Administrator
Permanent · LONDON
FASHION PERSONNEL
Digital E-Commerce Coordinator
Permanent · LONDON
FASHION PERSONNEL
National Account Manager
Permanent · LONDON
FASHION PERSONNEL
Deputy General Manager
Permanent · MANCHESTER
FASHION PERSONNEL
Facilities Coordinator
Permanent · LONDON
By
Reuters
Published
Jun 23, 2020
Reading time
2 minutes
Download
Download the article
Print
Text size

J&J loses bid to overturn baby powder verdict, but damages cut to $2.12 billion

By
Reuters
Published
Jun 23, 2020

A Missouri appeals court on Tuesday rejected Johnson & Johnson’s bid to throw out a jury verdict in favor of women who blamed their ovarian cancer on its baby powder and other talc products, but reduced damages by more than half to $2.12 billion (1.69 billion pounds).


Photo: Reuters



The Missouri Court of Appeals lowered the original $4.69 billion verdict from July 2018 after dismissing claims by some of the 22 women and their families who sued.

But it said the plaintiffs proved that J&J and an affiliate concealed for decades that its talc products contained asbestos, “worked tirelessly” to ensure that testing protocols would not detect asbestos in all talc samples, and published articles downplaying the safety hazards of talc.

“Plaintiffs proved with convincing clarity that defendants engaged in outrageous conduct because of an evil motive or reckless indifference,” the court said. “There was significant reprehensibility in defendants’ conduct.”

J&J pledged to appeal to the Missouri Supreme Court.

“This was a fundamentally flawed trial, grounded in a faulty presentation of the facts,” spokeswoman Kim Montagnino said. “We deeply sympathize with anyone suffering from cancer, which is why the facts are so important. We remain confident that our talc is safe, asbestos free, and does not cause cancer.”

Tuesday’s decision followed J&J’s May 19 announcement that it would stop selling its talc Baby Powder in the United States and Canada.

The New Brunswick, New Jersey-based company faces more than 19,000 lawsuits claiming that its talc products caused cancer because of contamination from asbestos, a known carcinogen.

J&J’s damages payout in Tuesday’s decision include $500 million of compensatory damages and $1.62 billion of punitive damages, down from a respective $550 million and $4.14 billion in the original verdict from a Missouri circuit court.

Mark Lanier, the lead lawyer for plaintiffs, called the decision “a clarion call for J&J to try and find a good way to resolve the cases for the people who have been hurt.”

J&J has faced intense scrutiny of its baby powder’s safety following a 2018 Reuters investigative report that found it knew for decades that asbestos lurked in its talc.

Internal company records, trial testimony and other evidence show that from at least 1971 to the early 2000s, J&J's raw talc and finished powders sometimes tested positive for small amounts of asbestos.

© Thomson Reuters 2024 All rights reserved.