×
319
Fashion Jobs
MAJE
Supervisor - Selfridges, London
Permanent · LONDON
BURBERRY
CRM Manager
Permanent · LONDON
TOPSHOP TOPMAN
CRM Coordinator
Permanent · London
TOPSHOP TOPMAN
Senior Marketing Manager
Permanent · London
ARCADIA GROUP
SEO Manager
Permanent · LONDON
ARCADIA GROUP
Digital Logistics Manager
Permanent · London
NEXT RETAIL LTD
Buyer - Womenswear (12 Month Contract)
Permanent · ENDERBY
GUCCI LIMITED
Gucci Visual Merchandising Manager
Permanent · LONDON
NEXT RETAIL LTD
Warehouse Operative (Part Time Afternoons - 14.00 - 20.00)
Permanent · PONTEFRACT
TOSHI TECHNOLOGIES LTD
London Experience And Operations Manager
Permanent · LONDON
TJX CORPORATE
Information Technology Graduate (2021)
Permanent · WATFORD
SHISEIDO
UK Supply Planner
Permanent · LONDON
NEXT RETAIL LTD
Loss Prevention Officer - Preston 721
Permanent · WALTON-LE-DALE
DESIGNER EXCHANGE
Digital Marketing Manager
Permanent · LONDON
SHISEIDO
Bareminerals Account Manager - Hoopers, Wilmslow (Maternity Cover) (37.5)
Permanent · Manchester
SHISEIDO
Bareminerals Account Manager - Debenhams, Winchester (Maternity Cover)
Permanent · Hampshire
SHISEIDO
Account Manager - Debenhams
Permanent · BURY SAINT EDMUNDS
SHISEIDO
Shisiedo Group Fragrance Account Manager - John Lewis, Brent Cross (22.5)
Permanent · London
STUDIO MINTI
Social Media Internship
Internship · LONDON
REISS
Store Manager
Permanent · BRISTOL
REISS
Store Manager
Permanent · MANCHESTER
LONDON ORGANIC PR
Social Media Intern - Facebook
Internship · LONDON

EssiLux case puts $8.5bn GrandVision takeover in doubt

By
Reuters
Published
Aug 11, 2020
Reading time
2 minutes
Share
Download
Download the article
Print
Click here to print
Text size
aA+ aA-


EssilorLuxottica said on Monday that GrandVision’s actions during the coronavirus crisis could provide grounds for ending its €7.2 billion ($8.5 billion) takeover of the Dutch eyewear stores operator.


Reuters

The French-Italian maker of Ray-Ban told a court hearing in Rotterdam that GrandVision had breached agreements by suspending payments to store owners and suppliers and by applying for state aid, without seeking its approval.

“GrandVision agreed to a contractual obligation to not change course. But it changed course drastically,” EssiLux’s lawyer Jeroen Kortmann said in court on Monday.

“We need to know which measures where taken and when, and what their effects were ... To see how material their breaches of the agreements were and whether that gives EssiLux the right to rethink the deal,” Kortmann added.

GrandVision said EssiLux was simply looking for a reason to get out of the deal, adding that the acquirer was informed of all measures to help stores survive the pandemic early on and that none of them meant it had deviated from its course.
“You can’t put your head in the sand when you see a major disaster coming towards you. It would not be in GrandVision’s ordinary course to ignore threats, to let its debt run up”, GrandVision’s lawyer Edward van Geuns told the court.

Van Geuns said EssiLux had not responded to the information GrandVision had given it about its coronavirus-related actions.

“For three months Essilux did not take any decision on our measures, did not say what specific information it needed or respond to our offer to talk about our operations,” he added.

EssiLux’s role as both a competitor and a major supplier of GrandVision made it impossible to simply hand over information without a clear and urgent need, Van Geuns said.

Last month GrandVision began an arbitration case against its buyer to ensure it complies with its obligations.

This followed legal proceedings by EssiLux, which announced its bid for Grandvision in July 2019.

If the deal does not go ahead it would bring an end to Essilux’s ambition to control the Dutch eyewear group’s more than 7,000 outlets across the world.

The Rotterdam court said it expects to give its verdict on the case on August 24.

© Thomson Reuters 2020 All rights reserved.